▸ GilpostWhere to go in Korea — researched, counted, sourced

Gilpost · Pyeongtaek-si, Bijeon-dong

Grill houseKorean

Daetamsosil

대탐소실 A pun on the Korean saying sotam-daesil, 'grasp at the small and lose the big' — flipped here to grasping at the big and losing only the small

Data as of · Published ·

An all-you-can-eat beef house on the first floor up of an office block at the far end of Manse-ro, in Pyeongtaek. You sit down and four cuts arrive unasked — sirloin, top blade, outside skirt, short rib — and when the plate is empty you carry it to the butcher's counter and ask for more of whichever you liked. Two hours from the time you arrive. The fire is charcoal; you change the grill plate yourself. As of 2026: ₩26,000 at lunch, ₩28,500 in the evening, ₩18,500 for primary-school children, ₩9,000 for under-sevens, free below three. Eleven in the morning to half past ten at night, last orders at half nine, no closing day. What actually brings people here is not the beef but the playroom — twenty-four of the twenty-six posts we read write about it. The shop opened in November 2024.

소고기구이
So-gogi-gui grilled beefAn AI drawing of So-gogi-gui as a dish. Not a photograph of this shop, and not drawn from this shop's menu. © Gilpost · no unauthorised reproduction

The basics

Address경기도 평택시 만세로 1770-3, 만세빌딩 1동 2층 (비전동)
1770-3 Manse-ro, Pyeongtaek-si, Gyeonggi-do
Typical spend₩22,000 – ₩28,500 only 1 of 11 dishes carries a price
Floor area382 m²
StatusIn business

When it opens

Of 21 posts: 21 wrote Daily 11:00–22:30.

OpenDaily11:00–22:30 21 of 21 posts last seen 2026-09
Last order21:30 15 of 15 posts last seen 2026-08

Counted from what bloggers wrote in their posts; we did not confirm it with the restaurant. Where the values differ, it may be a change over time rather than a disagreement, so we show when each one was written.

These hours are counted from the posts we read. Shops change them without notice — check Naver Place before you go. Place — check hours

What sets it apart

  1. Twenty-four posts write about the playroom. It is, in effect, what the shop sells. Several explain how they came to be here at all: they searched for restaurants with a playroom, or a brother-in-law did the searching. On its size the posts agree, and the agreement is "not big" — not enormous but children do not care; small but well made; small but very clean; certainly not spacious. Only one calls it large. What matters, reading them, is not the size but the sightline: four note that the walls are glass and you can watch from your table. One contrasts it with the usual arrangement, where the playroom is off somewhere and you eat uneasily; another likes that its door faces the self-service bar. Three call it clean. Two give an age limit and they contradict each other — under seven in one, over four or five in the other, and that one is hedged. We could not settle it. The under-seven price of ₩9,000 is described as including the playroom.
  2. Nine writers came with children, and they list what else is here for them. Four note the children's plates, spoons, forks and trays set out on the self-service bar, so that you need not flag a member of staff down and ask. Three mention high chairs, one specifying that there are plenty. Two point out the microwave on the bar, for warming a baby's food. One says the owner's fondness for children shows. One post, though, describes the playroom at peak: her photograph looks calm because she took it on the way out, and at the busy hour the room was swarming. And one writer puts the price question squarely — her own children eat enough beef to justify it, but with a small child who does not, she says, it could feel dear.
  3. Everything except the beef is ordered from your phone; seventeen posts describe it. There is an NFC tag on the table — hold the phone to it and an order screen opens — with a QR code as a fallback. A robot brings it. Eight write about the robot, mostly with affection: it is rushed off its wheels when the room is full, it plays a birthday song every time, the children love it. But the arrangement does not suit everyone. Two writers, independently, record the same scene: one thinks older customers might struggle and notes that staff will help, and the other watched the older people at the next table give up and call a member of staff over. A third says the opposite, that not having to summon anyone is the pleasure of it. The beef refill is the exception — for that you carry your empty plate to the butcher's counter yourself.
  4. The price has risen twice in sixteen months. Nine posts from June to December 2025 give ₩22,000 at lunch, ₩26,000 in the evening, ₩16,500 for a primary-school child; seven from March 2026 give ₩26,000, ₩28,500 and ₩18,500 — up by four thousand, two and a half thousand, and two thousand respectively. The under-seven price of ₩9,000 has not moved, nor has free entry below three. Even so only one post calls it expensive and twelve say the opposite, usually by arithmetic: under thirty thousand won for as much fresh beef as you want; a family of four fed for under a hundred thousand. That register survives the increases — it is as common after them as before. And the dissenting voice is conditional: worth it for a child who eats, dear for one who does not. Lunch pricing runs to a 14:30 arrival on weekdays only; weekends are charged at the evening rate whatever the hour. Two things to know besides: food left on the table costs ₩5,000, and nothing may be taken away. Your own bottle costs ₩20,000.
  5. It is big — nineteen say so and nobody says otherwise. Three describe tables running from fours to eights with sofa seating besides; one of them, a party of six adults and two children, was glad of the sofas for the grandparents. Two write about light coming through the large windows. Eight remark on the space between tables. On a busy day, though, the account changes. A Sunday visitor writes that with the room full, and tables pushed together in pairs, she and her husband ended up eating alongside strangers — there were freestanding tables, but there was a wait, so they took what they were given. Her conclusion is to come on a weekday. One post puts the capacity at 140; that line is lifted from the listing page and we have not counted it.
  6. Water and a plate of lettuce and perilla are all that comes to you; everything else you fetch. Twenty-three describe it. The bar runs down the middle of the room in two lines, and one writer copies out the whole of it: three salads, four pickles, mushrooms, chillies, shredded onion and spring onion, sesame oil, salt, garlic, sausage, rice cake, bean sprouts, cabbage. There is marinated pork rib on it and nobody writes about eating it — six note it is there; one was too full and means to try it next time. Lettuce and perilla have to be asked for, and one writer adds the awkwardness of that: with vegetable prices where they are, she says, she hesitates. Another praises how quickly staff refill and clear it; another likes that the bar's tables are round, so children cannot catch themselves on a corner. One post dissents: nothing on it worth eating by comparison with a rival chain, onion cut too thick, and a dish that had not been properly washed. That is the only complaint of cleanliness in twenty-six posts; sixteen say the opposite.
  7. The beef is cut where you can see it. Four describe it: one finds the open counter reassuring and says so; one photographs the pink of it being trimmed by the door; one notes that it is cut when you order, not before; one is greeted by the display on stepping out of the lift. The refill happens at that counter — you carry your empty plate over, name a cut, and it is sliced for you. Writers note that you may ask for one cut only, that nobody makes you feel awkward about the quantity, that it comes back fast. Not one post reports the second plate being worse than the first; two say they expected exactly that and were surprised.
  8. That the beef is decent at all is the surprise these posts keep reporting. Six write about the juice in it; five make a point of there being no muttony smell — one of them says she is sensitive to it, that this is what usually keeps her out of such places, and that here it was fine. Nine record having gone in with low expectations, and one apologises to herself for having had them. Preferences among the cuts scatter: the outside skirt for one, the short rib for two, the top blade for two, the sirloin for another — and two rank the sirloin last (not bad, merely last; "the sirloin, not so much"). A third ate more sirloin than anything because it looked the freshest. On richness they divide: two find the fat well judged, while one gave up on the short rib halfway and finished on sirloin.
  9. Seven posts talk about the staff and all seven are warm, with specific scenes that overlap: a fan aimed at a customer's legs when the brazier proved too hot; wasabi fetched by robot on request, since it is not on the bar; a refill brought the moment it was asked for; an order taken by hand for customers the phone system had defeated. A regular says the owner and staff greet her every time; another, who has watched the place since it opened, notes with something like gratitude that a year on it is still kept clean. One adds a qualification: the staff are kind — though one of them, a foreign man, had almost no Korean. Not a complaint about manner but about language, and no other post mentions it.
  10. Three posts are return visits and six more promise one. The three returners each noticed something different. One has watched the place since it opened and reports that a year on it is still kept as clean. One is a regular who comes with her baby whenever she wants beef, and passes on which table to ask for — the one beside the playroom. The third came back after some months and noted two things: that it seems to have got more popular, and that the pineapple, once unlimited on the self-service bar, is now four pieces free per table and paid for after that. Having watched people work through nothing else on an earlier visit, she says she understands the change. All three say the beef itself is unchanged — one puts it as coming back after a long gap and finding the quality exactly where she left it. Across two price rises and the loss of the free pineapple, no returning writer reports the place getting worse.

What 26 bloggers said

We read all 26 in full. The most common claims are “Roomy” (19) and “Clean” (16).

What they liked

Roomy19 of 26 posts
Clean16 of 26 posts
Not expensive12 of 26 posts
Friendly staff7 of 26 posts
Juicy6 of 26 posts
Would return6 of 26 posts
No gamey smell5 of 26 posts
No wait3 of 26 posts
Large portions4 of 26 posts
Returning customer3 of 26 posts
Not greasy2 of 26 posts
Comfortable seating1 of 26 posts

Things you can check on site

Kids' play room24 of 26 posts
Free refills23 of 26 posts
Self-order screen17 of 26 posts
Second floor12 of 26 posts
Lift to the floor6 of 26 posts
Time limit on the table6 of 26 posts
Local currency accepted5 of 26 posts
Open kitchen4 of 26 posts
High chairs3 of 26 posts
Phone charging3 of 26 posts
Large windows2 of 26 posts
Toilet outside2 of 26 posts
Discount offered2 of 26 posts
Review event2 of 26 posts
Separate restrooms1 of 26 posts
Step-free access1 of 26 posts
Cooked to order1 of 26 posts

These are raw counts, not percentages. Someone who did not mention something is not someone who disagreed.

The most ordered dish is sogogi muhanribil (소고기 무한리필 (등심 · 부채살 · 토시살 · 갈비살)) — 26 of 26 posts.

The prices here are what bloggers wrote down in their posts, and they may have changed since. Check Naver Place for the current menu and prices. This list is not a menu board — it counts what bloggers actually ordered and ate. Check on Naver Place

Parking

17 posts say you can park. None say you cannot.

Posts saying you can park17 of 26 posts

The car park is this place's boast, and seventeen posts write about it. It belongs to the building, wraps front and back, and costs nothing. The register is consistent — one calls it the size of a sports field, another says her photograph shows only part of it, a third that even a nervous driver can park here without stress. Two record finding space at Sunday lunchtime, the hour you would expect it to be full. One had worried, seeing the lane, and was surprised. The one post that gives a number says over a hundred spaces; that reads as the shop's claim rather than anyone's count, so we have not used it. One notes that other businesses in the building share the lot. Three mention a disabled bay — all three copied from the listing page, and none of them looked.

Who came, and with whom

Family visit14 of 26 posts
Came with children9 of 26 posts
Date5 of 26 posts
Came by car4 of 26 posts
Group visit1 of 26 posts
With a friend1 of 26 posts

Getting there

Map showing where Daetamsosil is

Getting inside

Second floor12 of 26 posts
Lift to the floor6 of 26 posts
Step-free access1 of 26 posts
Toilet insideyes 0 · no 2 (of 26 posts read)
Separate restrooms1 of 26 posts

It is one floor up, and twelve writers say so in their own words; six of them took the lift. Several describe stepping out of it straight in front of the door, which at least tells you there is nothing further to negotiate. The block is called Manse Building, block one. One notes the prices posted downstairs at street level. Not one post describes using the stairs — nobody counts them or says where they are. Five remark that the sign is large enough to spot from a distance.

Only one writer looked at the question with her own eyes, and what she says is this: the lift is wide enough for a pushchair or a wheelchair. That is about the lift. It is not about a step at the door, a ramp, or what happens inside. Five other posts carry the words "wheelchair accessible entrance", and in all five the words sit inside a copied block — corkage, group bookings, wi-fi, playroom, separated toilets, high chairs, waiting area, accessible entrance, disabled parking, run together beside the phone number. Not one of those five looked at the door. We have not counted them. So: a lift, and a wide one, on one person's account. A door immediately outside it, on several. Whether there is a threshold to cross, we do not know. Eight posts describe a roomy floor with space between the tables, which sounds navigable — but none of them was measuring.

The toilets are not inside the restaurant but out in the building's corridor. Two writers say so in their own words, and one of them adds what it meant in practice: in October, she advises putting a coat on the children before sending them. Worth knowing if you are bringing one. A third actually looked at them — separated by sex, immediately to the right of the restaurant door, and well kept. Hers is the only first-hand confirmation of the separation. Five other posts carry the phrase, all five inside a copied listing block, and we have not counted those. Nobody writes about an accessible toilet. Nobody says how many cubicles there are, or which way down the corridor.

No one mentioned: In a basement · Ramp at the door · Step at the entrance · Accessible toilet. That is not the same as there being none — it means we could not confirm it. Worth calling ahead, and do tell us: we will put it here.

How to read these posts

  • Someone else paid1 of 26 posts
  • Posts saying they paid themselves14 of 26 posts
  • Posts saying nothing either way11 of 26 posts

Posts that followed a TV spot

Of the 27 posts we gathered, 1 went up on a single day right after a TV spot and show no sign of a visit. They retell the broadcast, so we left them out of the counts.

We do not discard them. That a TV spot produced a burst of posts is itself something worth knowing about a place, and a star rating will not show it.

When the posts appeared

0607080910111203040506070809
Month by month
MonthPosts
2025-061
2025-071
2025-082
2025-091
2025-104
2025-112
2025-121
2026-031
2026-042
2026-052
2026-062
2026-073
2026-082
2026-092

What we do not know

  • Four of thirty candidate posts are out, which leaves twenty-six posts by twenty-six people. Three carried another restaurant's listing ID and went before we read anything. The fourth, from December 2025, is not an account of a visit — it is a round-up blog summarising other people's reviews, and its substance is sentences like "recent reviews show high satisfaction with the quality and quantity of the beef". No dish, no date. The twenty-six that remain show no sign of copying each other: they are spread evenly across sixteen months, never more than two in a month, and no blogger appears twice. Not one declares a sponsorship; fourteen state that they paid, two of them posting the receipt. One records a lunch paid for by the writer's employer. The other eleven say nothing either way.
  • Not one of the twenty-six explains how to get here without a car. No station, no bus stop, no walk in minutes. What they write about instead is finding it: the building is visible from the main road but set back from it, and one writer remembers doubting she had the right place. Another says flatly that the satnav does not take you the last stretch, and writes out the turn — past the soup place, past the petrol station, right into the lane before the supermarket car park, then straight on. A third had assumed a building down a lane could not have parking. It reads as a place you drive to: four say they did, and nobody records arriving any other way.
  • Exactly one post records waiting. A Sunday visitor in April 2026 writes that freestanding tables existed but, there being a wait, she had to sit where she was put — not a queue outside so much as no choice of table. Three others went at busy hours and found it easy: Sunday lunch and still roomy; a weekday lunchtime that suited someone who dislikes crowds; a weekday before the rush. Others describe a full room — a packed evening, a surprisingly busy three o'clock — but none of them waited. One guesses there must be a queue at weekends; she did not encounter one. With room for something like a hundred and forty, it reads less like a place you queue for than one where, on a Sunday, you take the table you are given. Booking is possible: one writer passes on that parties of twenty or more should ring.
  • You change your own grill plate. Six describe it, and most take it in their stride while some count it against the place — one lists it under what disappointed her, adding that at the price she understands; another calls it mildly annoying but easy. Two prefer it: no waiting for staff, no repeatedly calling someone over. One writer sets out the procedure in four steps — new plates and tongs live under the self-service bar; lift the old one out, drop the new one in, put the old one in the box by the bar. There is a second thing about the fire: it is hot. One writer moved seats because the brazier was too much where she first sat; another says the heat came straight up at her and that the owner, seeing it, aimed a fan at her legs. And one says the opposite — that the brazier sits low enough that the heat never reached her face. On the same equipment the accounts disagree, and we could not settle which is right.
  • Twenty-two posts give the hours and not one of them disagrees: eleven in the morning to half past ten at night, every day, last orders at half past nine. One states outright that there is no closing day and no afternoon break. What matters here is not opening time but arrival time: your two hours run from when you walk in, and the lunch price applies only to a weekday arrival before 14:30. At weekends you pay the evening rate however early you come. Is two hours enough? One writer says it is more than enough, beef cooking as fast as it does; another was finished in an hour and a half. One regular makes a point of arriving at eleven.
  • Five posts say the shop takes local-currency cards and the government consumption voucher — and all five were written between August and November 2025, while that scheme was running. One adds a ten per cent top-up on the municipal gift certificate that month. No post from 2026 repeats any of it. Whether the scheme ended or the shop stopped accepting it, we do not know; ask before you rely on it. One post lists the other methods: credit and debit cards, and cash. The promotions are dated in the same way — a hundred-won bottle of beer or soju for the first anniversary, to 4 November 2025 (two posts); a free stew or bottle for writing a receipt review (two); an egg-custard voucher for people born in a particular year (one). All of these were running then. We cannot say what is running now.

Sources (26)

Every number above was counted from the posts below.

  1. 평택 가성비 맛집 소고기 무한리필 놀이방 있는 식당 내돈내산 대탐.... 2026-09-27 · 무해한 나의 미니미
  2. 소고기 무제한 "대탐소실"[평택 비전동] 2026-09-13 · 배고프다 밥먹자
  3. 평택 비전동 맛집 대탐소실 소고기 무한리필 실하다 ʕ•ﻌ•ʔ 2026-08-11 · Love is,
  4. 평택 만세로 맛집 대탐소실| 대형 주차장에 유아 놀이방이 있는 소고기 무한리필 고깃집 2026-08-04 · 해루의 슬기로운 소비 생활 · via Daum
  5. 평택맛집 만세로맛집 소고기무한리필 놀이방식당 대탐소실 내돈내.... 2026-07-17 · 로로패밀리님의 블로그
  6. 입터진 주말 2026-07-12 · 감동 · via Daum
  7. [평택 맛집] 대탐소실 평택점, 놀이방 시설 완벽! 온 가족이 대만족.... 2026-07-03 · 브로맘로그
  8. 경기도 평택 비전동 대탐소실 소고기 무한리필 가성비 맛집 2026-06-17 · ᴀʟᴡᴀʏs ʙᴇ ʜᴀᴘᴘʏ
  9. ⁠[평택 대탐소실] 만세로 무한리필 소고기 맛집, 놀이방 있는 단체 모임 장소 추천⁠ 2026-06-10 · 얼렁뚱땅 당비네 · via Daum
  10. 배 터지게 먹고 온 평택 대탐소실 소고기 무한리필 2026-05-27 · ssonog님의 블로그 · via Daum
  11. 평택 무한리필 소고기 대탐소실 내돈내산 후기 2026-05-21 · I love it · via Daum
  12. 가성비와 맛 모두 잡은 평택 비전동 소고기 무한리필 맛집 대탐소실.... 2026-04-23 · 안미끼
  13. [평택 비전동] 유아 놀이방 있는 소고기 무한리필 "대탐소실" 다녀왔.... 2026-04-04 · 유니로그
  14. 평택 비전동 소고기 무한리필 맛집 대탐소실 가성비 최고 고기집 2026-03-10 · 툐시의 오늘도,
  15. [평택/맛집] 비전동 소고기 무한리필 '대탐소실' 놀이방 키즈룸 모임.... 2025-12-14 · 함께하면즐거운
  16. 평택 비전동 대탐소실 2025-11-18 · 담다
  17. 평택 만세로 소고기 무한리필 맛집. 대탐소실 💳 내돈내산 2025-11-01 · 쩜로그 · via Daum
  18. (평택맛집) 비전동 대탐소실 무한리필고기-놀이방음식점 2025-10-29 · 오늘이 가장 좋은날 ♪
  19. 평택 만세로 놀이방 식당 소고기 무한리필 대탐소실 내돈내산 2025-10-26 · : )
  20. 평택 키즈룸이 있는 소고기 무한리필 식당 ‘대탐소실’ 내돈내산 / 아기 소고기 정량 2025-10-15 · 육아하며 정보 공유하는 자매맘 공간ෆ⸒⸒ · via Daum
  21. [평택무한리필] 퀄리티 좋은 소고기 무한리필로 먹을수 있고 놀이방.... 2025-10-11 · 미지 맛템로그(log)
  22. [평택 : 대탐소실] 평택 비전동 소고기 무한리필 2025-09-07 · 매엥자네 뚱땅뚱땅 일상:)
  23. 가성비 소고기 무한리필 평택 대탐소실 키즈존 맛집 방문기 2025-08-31 · 남콩 소소한 일상 이야기
  24. 평택 대탐소실 – 소고기 무한리필 집 솔직 후기 2025-08-03 · 일상의 모든것
  25. 평택 소고기 맛집 : 아이랑 함께 가기 좋은 소고기 무한리필 평택 대.... 2025-07-21 · 푸링이네 ᰔ
  26. [평택 소고기 무한리필] 대탐소실 질 좋은 고기가 무한?! 내돈내산 .... 2025-06-19 · *Oh Happy ruro day*

Of 176 candidate posts we opened 60 and kept 26 as evidence. We stop once 30 are confirmed: beyond that the counts grow in proportion without changing the answer.