gilpost.
돈카츠
Tonkatsu (pork cutlet) breaded pork cutletAn AI drawing of Tonkatsu (pork cutlet) as a dish. Not a photograph of this shop, and not drawn from this shop's menu. © Gilpost · no unauthorised reproduction

Gilpost · Dalseo-gu, Sangin-dong

Sseorilo Donkkaseu

써리로 돈까스 A 2002 basement cutlet house in Daegu whose name is dialect for let's go slice one

Western · Dalseo-gu, Sangin-dong

Compiled from 28 blog posts read in fullSources →

Sseorilo is a basement cutlet house at a crossroads in south-west Daegu. The name is dialect — one writer explains that it is how you would say "let's go slice up a cutlet" in these parts, worn down to two syllables. It opened in 2002; the sign says since 2002, the doorway says thirty years and the listing says forty, so take your pick. Loin is beaten thin, breaded, fried and covered in brown sauce; a bowl of cream soup arrives first, and the side dishes and hot udon broth are self-serve, as much as you want. The plain cutlet is ₩7,000 and comes as two pieces; ₩2,000 more makes it three. Beyond cutlets there is omelette-rice, spaghetti, rice cake, kimchi stew, udon, ramen and a list of drinking food, plus one-person sets that put two of those on a single plate. It is right outside exit 4 of the subway, and there is no car park. The posts we read run from April 2025 to September 2026.

Data as of · Published ·

Location & hours

  • Address대구광역시 달서구 월곡로 269-1 (상인동)269-1 Wolgok-ro, Dalseo-gu, Daegu
  • Typical spend₩6,500 – ₩12,000
  • From the station15 posts say it is walkable from the station.
  • Floor areaFloor area 43 m² · Status In business

When it opens

Of 21 posts: 12 wrote Daily 11:30–21:30.

When it opens
Daily11:30–21:3012 of 21 posts
ClosedSunday20 of 20 posts
1 other values
OpenDaily11:30–22:30 9 of 21 posts last seen 2025-11

The values differ, but the periods they were written in do not overlap. This looks like a change over time rather than a disagreement, and the top row is the most recently reported. We did not confirm it with the restaurant.

These hours are counted from the posts we read. Shops change them without notice — check Naver Place before you go. Place — check hours

What sets it apart

  1. All twenty-one posts that discuss money say the same thing: it is cheap. Not one calls it expensive. Seven thousand won, in this economy. Three cutlets for under ten thousand. Four main dishes and a drink for two people, and change from thirty-five thousand. Three note the government's "fair price shop" designation on the wall. And yet, laid out by date, almost every price here has risen by a thousand won — the cheese cutlet, the omelette-rice, the tomato spaghetti, the omelette set, the stew set. One thing has not moved, and it is the plain cutlet: ₩7,000 in June 2025 and ₩7,000 in August 2026. Eleven writers record that figure. One paid with the city's local-currency card.
  2. This is a place you reach by train — fifteen posts name the station. Five give a distance and none agree: thirty-seven metres, forty, fifty, three minutes' walk, under five. All of them mean exit 4 of line 1, and four add that it is opposite the department store. The red sign is visible from the crossroads, with a standing board out on the pavement, and it lights up in the evening. Driving is the opposite story: sixteen posts say there is nowhere to park. No lot of its own, use a paid one nearby, is the standard line; four write from experience about circling, squeezing into the alley behind the building, or hunting for a gap in the back lanes. One suggests the department store's car park instead. Nobody says how many cars fit, because there is nowhere for them.
  3. Every side dish is self-serve, and twenty-four posts say so. Kimchi, pickled radish, gherkins, cabbage salad, soy-pickled onion and chillies, and the pot of hot udon broth that belongs to this kind of restaurant. Water too. Take as much as you want, several say, and nobody is watching. Five single out the cabbage salad, one for the kiwi dressing on it. One is pleased that the dishes sit under covers. Seven mention the takeaway boxes set out at the side — which reads as a consequence of the portions: fifteen posts say there is too much to finish.
  4. Nine posts are about the owner, and eight of them are warm. The specifics recur: noticing an empty salad tray and refilling it, and offering the seat by the heater; bringing a bowl of soup to a table that had not ordered the dish that comes with it; ladling out more rice without being asked; telling a table twice to say if the rice ran short; taking payment from eight schoolchildren one at a time without visible irritation. One goes the other way — a May 2025 writer found the owner's face unhappy that day and wondered whether she was ill. That same sentence records that she had been kind before. Another writer describes her as an aunt from the neighbourhood.

What 28 bloggers said

24/28Most ordered
self bar
20/28Most-said good thing
Not expensive
0/28Posts disclosing payment

We read all 28 in full. The most common claims are “Not expensive” (20) and “Large portions” (15).

What they liked

Not expensive20 of 28 posts
Large portions15 of 28 posts
Friendly staff8 of 28 posts
Would return6 of 28 posts
Returning customer5 of 28 posts
Clean4 of 28 posts
No wait3 of 28 posts

What they struggled with

Unremarkable4 of 28 posts
Food comes slowly3 of 28 posts
Heavy / greasy1 of 28 posts

Where they disagree

Roomyyes 6 · no 2

Things you can check on site

  • Free refills 24 of 28 posts
  • In a basement 19 of 28 posts
  • Reachable by transit 15 of 28 posts
  • Takeout 10 of 28 posts
  • Review event 7 of 28 posts
  • Toilet inside 2 of 28 posts
  • Separate restrooms 1 of 28 posts
  • Takes reservations 1 of 28 posts
  • Local currency accepted 1 of 28 posts

These are raw counts, not percentages. Someone who did not mention something is not someone who disagreed.

The most ordered dish is self bar (셀프바 (반찬·우동국물)) — 24 of 28 posts.

The prices here are what bloggers wrote down in their posts, and they may have changed since. Check Naver Place for the current menu and prices. This list is not a menu board — it counts what bloggers actually ordered and ate. Check on Naver Place

13 more dishes

Parking

16 posts say you cannot park. None say you can.

Posts saying you cannot16 of 28 posts

Who came, and with whom

  • Date 2 of 28 posts
  • Solo visit 2 of 28 posts
  • Came by car 2 of 28 posts
  • With a friend 1 of 28 posts

Where it is

Map showing where Sseorilo Donkkaseu is

From the station

This is a place you reach by train — fifteen posts name the station. Five give a distance and none agree: thirty-seven metres, forty, fifty, three minutes' walk, under five. All of them mean exit 4 of line 1, and four add that it is opposite the department store. The red sign is visible from the crossroads, with a standing board out on the pavement, and it lights up in the evening. Driving is the opposite story: sixteen posts say there is nowhere to park. No lot of its own, use a paid one nearby, is the standard line; four write from experience about circling, squeezing into the alley behind the building, or hunting for a gap in the back lanes. One suggests the department store's car park instead. Nobody says how many cars fit, because there is nowhere for them.

Getting inside

In a basement19 of 28 posts
Toilet inside2 of 28 posts
Separate restrooms1 of 28 posts

This place is below ground, and not one post puts it on an upper floor. Nineteen of the twenty-nine say basement level; the rest do not give a floor at all, and nobody climbs a stair on the way in. Being underground does half the work of these write-ups: the entrance as a time machine, the stairs down as the pleasant part, and one writer climbing back out afterwards and feeling returned to the present.

It is one floor down. Nineteen writers describe the descent — the staircase itself as the time machine, the basement light that made one hesitate at the top, the karaoke-bar atmosphere of the entrance. But one describes it as a single step down, another finds the air a bit close, and a third says the room is wide enough that being underground never registers. Nobody writes how many steps there are, whether there is a handrail, or whether there is a lift. One adds that being right outside the subway exit makes it easy enough to find despite being below street level.

Nobody says whether you can get in with a wheelchair or a pushchair. In twenty-nine posts no one mentions a threshold, a ramp or a handrail. What nineteen of them do say is that the room is a floor below the street and you go down to it, which is worth knowing before you set out. One writer notes customers of every age down to a babe in arms, and four came as families, but not a line about a pushchair. Nobody mentions a high chair or a changing table either. Bear in mind too that the side dishes must be fetched from a self-serve counter — twenty-four posts describe doing it.

Only three posts mention the toilet at all: one says it is inside, one records simply that there is one, and one puts "separate men's and women's" in an information block. All three are single lines, so we cannot say how many cubicles there are, where in the basement it sits, or whether there is a step into it. The other twenty-six say nothing. One writer counted seven different side dishes on the self-serve counter; on this, everyone is silent.

No one mentioned: Second floor · Lift to the floor · Ramp at the door · Step at the entrance · Step-free access · Accessible toilet. That is not the same as there being none — it means we could not confirm it. Worth calling ahead, and do tell us: we will put it here.

How to read these posts

  • Posts saying they paid themselves10 of 28 posts
  • Posts saying nothing either way18 of 28 posts

When the posts appeared

040506070809111201020406070809
Month by month
MonthPosts
2025-041
2025-053
2025-062
2025-072
2025-081
2025-092
2025-112
2025-121
2026-013
2026-022
2026-043
2026-063
2026-071
2026-081
2026-091

What we do not know

  • We counted twenty-nine posts, not thirty. One was a write-up of a different cutlet house across the road; this place appeared in it only as one of two old-timers in the neighbourhood, plus a preview card linking that writer's own earlier post. Nobody declares a sponsorship. Ten say they paid; the other nineteen say nothing either way. But the shop runs a review promotion — post about it on social media and you get a free drink. Seven writers reproduce the notice and one records collecting hers from the self-serve counter. That is not sponsorship, but it does mean a fair number of these posts may have come with a bottle attached, so we count it and say so. One more thing: the age of the place is given as thirty years, forty, twenty-four, twenty-five and twenty-two. Five posts date the opening to 2002, which makes twenty-four in 2026 — but the doorway and the listing print different numbers, and each writer copies whichever they saw. One post catches the discrepancy and says so plainly.
  • Three posts say the food comes slowly; one says it came quickly. The slow ones are specific. In June 2026 a spaghetti set took just over half an hour, and the writer — who had never waited that long anywhere — noticed only one person in the kitchen and thought something needed to change. A May 2025 post blames a backlog of delivery orders. A January 2026 post waited for the rice cake and concluded it was worth waiting for. Against them, a February 2026 writer found her omelette set arrived sooner than expected. Six posts remark on the volume of delivery orders — one looked at an empty dining room, wondered how the place survived, and then watched order after order go out the door. An empty room here does not mean an idle kitchen. Note too that an April 2025 post counts two people working in the kitchen and a June 2026 post sees only one. We could not establish which is current.
  • Nobody records queueing. What three posts describe instead is a room that fills while you eat: one table occupied at opening and every seat taken by the time they finished; a half-empty room at arrival and a rush of customers minutes later; a 11:31 arrival and a steady stream from noon. One writer, visiting in the rain, had the place to herself. Around midday looks like the busy hour, but since nobody actually waited we cannot say more than that. Several describe who is there: older regulars, families, and groups of schoolchildren arriving after classes. One found herself next to eight noisy middle-schoolers and regretted the table.
  • "Worn" and "clean" turn up in the same sentences here. Four posts call it clean and all four qualify it: visibly aged but very well kept; tidy inside; the covers over the side dishes, which one writer appreciates; a clean self-serve counter. Against them, one finds the basement air a little close and forgives it as the price of age, and one warns off anyone hoping for a modern room. Nobody calls it dirty. Six reach for the same comparison — an old tea room — and three name the same television drama about the nineteen-eighties.
  • Six posts call the room roomy and two call it small. The six point at sofa booths plus tables through the middle, at enough seats that the basement never feels tight, at more tables than expected. The two say compact and cosy — and neither means it as a complaint. Four mention a larger table at the back for groups, one putting it at about eight. Two describe the old sofa booths, entered through arches, as pleasantly private. Only one writer tries to count, and gets no further than "fours".
  • Four posts call it ordinary, six say they will be back, and one says she will not. The four are not complaints — not remarkable, but good enough to eat alongside the memory; no match for the new specialists, but nothing touches it on value; not a high-quality cutlet, but at this price I would buy it again. Almost every one turns on a "but". The single refusal came from the garlic-soy version, and from a writer wondering whether it was the shop that had changed or her own palate. Five posts, meanwhile, are returns — a woman who first came as a schoolgirl and came back decades later; a man who first ate here over a decade ago and has thought "still there" every time he passed since; another who spent a few years touring newer places before coming back.

Sources (28)

Every number above was counted from the posts below.

  1. [대구 달서구 상인동 맛집] 경양식 돈까스 써리로 갔다가 추억 떠올.... 2026-09-18 · 어떻게든 맛있는거 먹겠다고
  2. 대구 상인동 맛집 써리로돈까스 7천원 가성비 경양식 돈까스 2026-08-06 · 돼지될지도
  3. [대구/상인동] 오래된 상인동 돈까스 맛집 써리로 돈까스 2026-07-16 · 요기조기 마카다
  4. 대구 경양식 돈까스 맛집, 상인동 써리로 돈까스 2026-06-27 · 오늘의 우리
  5. 대구 경양식 돈까스 맛집 써리로 스프까지 맛있는 노포 추천 2026-06-24 · 미니홈피 • . • ♡
  6. [대구맛집]#대구상인동맛집#경양식맛집#가성비식당#상인동 돈까스.... 2026-06-16 · 삶은여행~
  7. 7. 대구 달서구 상인동 써리로 돈까스 - 돈까스에 김치찌개 파는 곳 2026-04-28 · Hakpunteum
  8. 대구 상인동 돈까스 맛집 - 써리로 돈까스 / 추억의 맛집 2026-04-27 · 일상 담아두기 ☺︎
  9. 대구 상인동 레트로 식당 경양식 수제 돈까스 맛집 써리로 돈까스 2026-04-09 · You Only Live Once
  10. [대구] 40년 전통 수제 돈까스 <써리로 돈가스> 2026-02-20 · 까온로그
  11. [대구 달서구 상인동] 노포 옛날 돈까스 맛집 써리로돈까스 방문 후.... 2026-02-01 · 내맘대로 기록 모음zip
  12. 260131 최근 나의 일상 2026-01-31 · pogeunpogeun · via Daum
  13. 대구로페이 후기 "써리로돈까스" 2026-01-27 · Record, by bean
  14. 대구 상인동 돈까스 맛집 레트로 감성 :: 써리로돈까스 2026-01-24 · 제브로우의 일상
  15. 써리로 돈까스ㅣ대구 상인동 맛집 가성비 식당 내돈내산 혼밥 2025-12-28 · 졈둥이의 하루
  16. 써리로 돈까스 대구 경양식 맛집(상인동 상인역 근처) 2025-11-26 · 림이 블로그
  17. 상인동 가성비 돈까스 맛집 써리로 돈까스 2025-11-19 · Daily
  18. 대구 써리로 돈까스 우리동네 상인동 맛집 추천 경양식 후기 2025-09-08 · 림이 블로그
  19. 대구 상인동 경양식 돈까스 써리로 2025-09-05 · 이바스키
  20. 대구 상인동 가성비 돈까스 맛집 , 써리로 돈까스 2025-08-13 · 후기얌얌 !
  21. 대구 상인동 밥집 써리로 돈까스 오래된 경양식 맛집 2025-07-22 · 인생정보블로그
  22. 대구 상인동 가성비 맛집 써리로 돈까스 후기 2025-07-03 · 순간을 소중히
  23. 대구 상인동 가성비 돈까스집/상인동 돈까스 맛집[써리로] 2025-06-22 · [[작은 순간, 큰 행복]]
  24. 대구 달서구 경양식돈까스가 맛있고 사이드메뉴가 다양한 써리로수제돈까스 내돈내산 후기 2025-06-09 · 먼지팡이집사의일상 · via Daum
  25. [대구 상인동 맛집/경양식 돈까스 맛집] 써리로 돈까스 2025-05-22 · kyounglog❤️
  26. 하루하루 행복한 요즘 (20-25weeks) 2025-05-19 · loveisall · via Daum
  27. [Nov.26-28.24] 잠시 또 다시 안녕 한국! 2025-05-03 · ♡ · via Daum
  28. [상인동 맛집]써리로 수제 돈까스 전문점에서 돈까스와 김치 뚝배기 한상의 조화의 맛은(양식과 한식)? 2025-04-13 · Zinozi Studio · via Daum

Of 171 candidate posts we opened 53 and kept 28 as evidence. We stop once 30 are confirmed: beyond that the counts grow in proportion without changing the answer.