▸ GilpostWhere to go in Korea — researched, counted, sourced

Gilpost · Haeundae-gu, U-dong

Haemok Haeundae-jeom

해목 해운대점 The original branch of Haemok, a Nagoya-style charcoal-grilled eel house a few minutes' walk from Haeundae station, where almost everyone orders either the hitsumabushi or the seafood bowl and joins the queue through a phone app.

Japanese · Haeundae-gu, U-dong

Data as of · Published ·

Haemok's Haeundae branch is a Japanese restaurant on Gunam-ro 24beon-gil, three to five minutes' walk from Haeundae station on line 2. The house dish is hitsumabushi — Nagoya-style charcoal-grilled eel over rice — with the kaisendon, a seafood bowl, close behind it. Several writers say the timber building stands out from the street; inside there is a ground floor and a first floor, tatami seating, a counter and a private room. It opens at eleven every day and closes at ten, last orders 20:50, with an afternoon break from 14:50 that some days has and some days does not, which is why the posts disagree about it. Thirteen writers mention the Michelin Guide Busan and the Blue Ribbon; two note that of the several branches — Jamsil, Nonhyeon, Daegu Shinsegae — this is the original. The twenty-six posts we read run from July to September 2026.

The basics

Address부산광역시 해운대구 구남로24번길 8 (우동)
8 Gunam-ro 24beon-gil, Haeundae-gu, Busan
Phone051-746-3730
Typical spend₩3,500 – ₩58,000
Floor area387 m²
StatusIn business

2 posts say it is walkable from the station.

When it opens

Of 20 posts: 14 wrote Daily 11:00–22:00, 6 wrote 11:00–22:00.

OpenDaily11:00–22:00 14 of 20 posts last seen 2026-09
Open11:00–22:00 6 of 20 posts last seen 2026-09
BreakWeekdays14:50–17:00 10 of 14 posts last seen 2026-09
Break14:50–17:00 4 of 14 posts last seen 2026-09
BreakWeekends없음 2 of 14 posts last seen 2026-09
Last order20:50 7 of 10 posts last seen 2026-09
Last orderDaily20:50 2 of 10 posts last seen 2026-09
Closed없음 2 of 2 posts last seen 2026-09

Counted from what bloggers wrote in their posts; we did not confirm it with the restaurant. Where the values differ, it may be a change over time rather than a disagreement, so we show when each one was written.

What sets it apart

  1. When you go is the whole question. Twenty-four writers address the wait: twelve waited, seven did not. They are not contradicting each other — they went at different hours. Among those who waited: one joined the remote queue the moment it opened at 11:30 on a Sunday and got in at 13:40; another put their name down at 11:32 on a Tuesday and found fifty-eight parties ahead; a third simply turned up at 11:30 on a weekday, found eighteen ahead, and was seated at 11:50. Even the writer who arrived at 9:40 in the morning to be first found three parties already there. Everyone who walked straight in had avoided mealtimes — four in the afternoon on a Sunday, twenty past five on a Sunday, two on a weekday afternoon, the moment the afternoon break ended, half past seven, eight in the evening. Where the wait is timed at all it comes out as forty minutes twice, twenty minutes once, and two hours once. One person notes a further thirty to forty minutes after being seated — better than standing outside, they say, but still a long time. Two others report the opposite: the bowls arrive fast and the tables turn over quickly.
  2. The queueing app runs this place — thirteen of the twenty-six used one. Walk-up registration starts at ten in the morning on a machine by the door; remote queueing opens at 11:20 by some accounts and 11:30 by others, and we cannot tell which is current. Writers do not even agree on which app — eight say Tabling, two say CatchTable, one says Naver booking, adding that Naver will only hold a table seat, not a counter one, and that no booking system existed when they last went. Two warnings recur for anyone queueing from a distance. Whether you can push your turn back seems to vary: one writer had read that you cannot and found that they could. And because staff call numbers continuously and skip parties who are not there, one writer advises being outside the restaurant once you are about tenth in line. One post notes that the app stops taking names altogether as the 20:50 last order approaches.
  3. The menu is long and the orders are not. Of twenty-six writers, nineteen ordered the eel bowl and sixteen the seafood bowl, in one size or the other. Five recommend that a pair order one of each and share — most couples seem to, one says. Another, walking in, noticed that almost everyone in the room was eating one or the other. One bowl per person is the rule: the bottom of the first menu page asks for it, and a writer reports being told that without a bowl of your own you cannot have the free extra rice. The extra rice itself costs nothing. Several people note maguro-don, sake-don, tempura and a sashimi platter on the menu; nobody records ordering any of them.
  4. There are several kinds of seat, and you do not get to choose. Three writers mention an upstairs — the stairs beside the toilets, a room count that runs "ground floor, first floor, counter", and one party led up to the first floor to find themselves its first customers of the day. Two describe tatami seating, one a section where you take your shoes off, four a counter, one a private room. Four call the place roomy and nobody calls it cramped. But the seats are not equal: one writer was put in what they describe as an extension rather than the dining room proper and found the backless chairs uncomfortable, and a family of six could not be seated together and split four and two. Quiet is disputed too — within a month, one writer praises it for not being loud despite the crowd, and another warns off anyone who wants a calm room, calling it as noisy as a market.
  5. Four writers call it expensive; one calls the prices fair. Fifty-eight thousand won made one of them anxious that it might not be worth it; another says it is a bit dear but they would go again; a third that it was pricey but the eel was extraordinarily tender; a fourth that the figures are eye-watering, but they were on holiday. Three of those four finish the same sentence by saying it was worth it anyway. The dissenting voice ate the standard eel bowl and found the price reasonable. One writer grants that this is not a cheap meal and says they will come back on their next trip to Busan regardless; another, weighing it against everything else in the city, decided it was not worth two hours of queueing and would not return. Nothing in the three months we read suggests a rise — ₩39,000 and ₩37,000 appear unchanged in August and September posts alike.
  6. This is a place you walk to. Plenty of writers say so, but they do not agree on which exit. Two give exit 5 at Haeundae station and 234 metres; one gives exit 2 and the same 234 metres; one gives exit 5 and a five-minute walk; one simply says three minutes from the station. Since the distance is identical and the exit number is not, we cannot say which is right. The walk itself is consistently put at three to five minutes. Two writers note that you can walk over from Haeundae beach; one, whose aim for the trip was to avoid driving, counts the location a success; one took a taxi straight from Busan station. One mentions a bus stop nearby.
  7. Three writers had been before, five say they will come again, one says they will not. The returners: someone on their third or fourth visit, someone back after three years, and someone who came in May and again in September and noticed the sea urchin had gone from the menu. Of those who mean to return, one concedes this is not a cheap meal and says they want to come back on their next trip anyway; another reports that their mother still brings up the eel bowl from time to time. The one refusal is blunt: very good, but with this many good restaurants in Busan it is not worth two hours of queueing, and they preferred the pork soup they had elsewhere. One writer sits exactly in between — they would not travel to Busan for it, but once in Busan they would suggest it. The other seventeen say nothing about their own return, so we have counted them neither way.
  8. Six writers say a member of staff talks them through how to eat it. There is a card on every table explaining the four rounds of the eel bowl, and staff explain it again anyway while serving; one describes them lifting the lids and arranging the dishes one by one. The seafood bowl gets the same treatment — pour the house dressing evenly over the fish in the box, then wrap fish and the rice beneath in seaweed. Four writers call the service kind and none complains of it: being waited on properly, staff so friendly it feels like being looked after, courtesy befitting the guide listing, five stars for friendliness. One writer notes that the shichimi and sansho pepper come only if you ask.

What 26 bloggers said

We read all 26 in full. The most common claims are “Would return” (5) and “Friendly staff” (4).

What they liked

Would return5 of 26 posts
Friendly staff4 of 26 posts
Roomy4 of 26 posts
Food comes quickly2 of 26 posts
Clean3 of 26 posts
Returning customer3 of 26 posts
Large portions2 of 26 posts
Quiet1 of 26 posts

What they struggled with

Expensive4 of 26 posts

Where they disagree

Had to waityes 12 · no 7

Things you can check on site

Takes reservations13 of 26 posts
Waiting area7 of 26 posts
Second floor3 of 26 posts
Beer served3 of 26 posts
Reachable by transit2 of 26 posts
Air conditioned2 of 26 posts
Floor seating2 of 26 posts
Review event1 of 26 posts
Free refills1 of 26 posts
One dish per person1 of 26 posts
Open kitchen1 of 26 posts
High chairs1 of 26 posts
Step-free access1 of 26 posts
Shoes off at the door1 of 26 posts
Foreign customers in the room1 of 26 posts
Private room1 of 26 posts
Takeout1 of 26 posts

These are raw counts, not percentages. Someone who did not mention something is not someone who disagreed.

The most ordered dish is minmul-jangeo hitsumabushi (민물장어 히츠마부시) — 19 of 26 posts.

The prices here are what bloggers wrote down in their posts, and they may have changed since. Check Naver Place for the current menu and prices. This list is not a menu board — it counts what bloggers actually ordered and ate. Check on Naver Place

Parking

5 posts say you cannot park. None say you can.

Posts saying you cannot5 of 26 posts

If you are driving, decide where to put the car before you go. Five writers state from their own experience that there is no car park of the restaurant's own; not one says otherwise. The five who drove all ended up somewhere different: the paid lot immediately next door (which belongs to the pork-soup restaurant beside it, ₩4,000 an hour), the Udong lot one or two minutes' walk away, the Amano Udong lot three minutes away, and the public lot at Haeundae market, under five minutes away at ₩500 per ten minutes. Do not count on the lot next door — one writer was told that it takes cars only from people about to be seated, space or no space, and another, returning after three years, found that parking there was no longer allowed at all and was turned away. One writer, calling street parking in this part of Haeundae essentially impossible, recommends the public lot; another recommends not driving at all. Only two of those prices appear anywhere; for the rest, nobody wrote down what they paid.

Who came, and with whom

Came by car5 of 26 posts
Date5 of 26 posts
Family visit3 of 26 posts
Group visit2 of 26 posts
Came with children1 of 26 posts
With a friend1 of 26 posts

Getting there

Map showing where Haemok Haeundae-jeom is

Naver Map has a full English mode — Settings → Language → English. In Korea it gives better walking and transit directions than Google Maps.

Getting inside

Second floor3 of 26 posts
Step-free access1 of 26 posts

One writer brought a pushchair; nobody mentions a wheelchair at all. That one party — six adults and a pushchair — reports from their own visit that you must flag the pushchair when you check in so that they can seat you where there is room for it, and that it then stands behind the table while you eat. That is the whole of it. The words wheelchair, ramp, threshold, step and lift do not appear once in the twenty-six posts. Three writers mention an upstairs, but none says whether you reach it by stairs or by lift, and nobody looked at the door for a step. That is not the same as there being none; it is that we could not check. Only that one post describes coming with a child, and the single mention of a high chair is one line saying they have them, with no sign the writer used one.

No one mentioned: In a basement · Lift to the floor · Ramp at the door · Step at the entrance · Toilet inside · Accessible toilet · Separate restrooms. That is not the same as there being none — it means we could not confirm it. Worth calling ahead, and do tell us: we will put it here.

How to read these posts

  • Posts disclosing payment1 of 26 posts
  • Someone else paid2 of 26 posts
  • Posts saying they paid themselves6 of 26 posts
  • Posts saying nothing either way17 of 26 posts

Posts that followed a TV spot

Of the 28 posts we gathered, 2 went up on a single day right after a TV spot and show no sign of a visit. They retell the broadcast, so we left them out of the counts.

We do not discard them. That a TV spot produced a burst of posts is itself something worth knowing about a place, and a star rating will not show it.

When the posts appeared

070809
Month by month
MonthPosts
2026-071
2026-083
2026-0922

What we do not know

  • We counted twenty-six of the thirty confirmed posts. Haemok has several branches, and the name alone drags the others in. Two posts contain nothing about this restaurant at all and were removed outright: one lists ten businesses in Daegu, the fifth of which is the Daegu Shinsegae branch — all ten of its check-ins belong to other places — and one is an account of a stay at Signiel Jamsil and a meal at the Lotte World Mall branch. Two more we kept on file but took out of the count. One introduces ten restaurants along Haeundae and Haeridan-gil, ours among them, with no visit described. The other is titled an honest first-hand review but consists entirely of menu copy and a template ending in a five-star rating: it never says what was ordered, who was there, or when. That is also why its prices — ₩57,000 and ₩36,000 — disagree with the twenty-six posts written by people who actually ate here, which say ₩58,000 and ₩37,000. Length and polish are not evidence.
  • Not one writer describes the toilets from having seen them. The line "separate men's and women's" does appear in two posts, but both times it sits inside a block that also recites no parking, takeaway available, high chairs, waiting area and booking app — the shape of a copied listing — so we have not counted it. Whether the toilets are inside the restaurant or out in the building, how many there are, where they are: nobody writes it down. The nearest thing is one writer describing the seating and remarking in passing that if you head towards the toilets there is a private room with counter seats — which suggests they are inside, or at least off the dining room, but even that writer never says they looked.
  • Not one post discloses sponsorship. Five of the twenty-six state outright that they paid their own way. Two had the bill paid by someone else: one ate on a company card while away on business, and one was treated by a friend marking a year since surgery. One received a single drink free and says so — staff offered an ume soda in return for writing a review, and they accepted; they paid for their own food. The remaining eighteen say nothing about money. Twenty-six posts here means twenty-six people on twenty-six different blogs — no writer appears twice, the dates run across July, August and September, and what each ordered and encountered differs enough that there is nothing to suggest a commissioned batch. What we should flag is that three months is all we have. The seasons have not come round once, and apart from two writers comparing this visit with an earlier one — "when I came in May", "what has changed in three years" — these posts cannot tell you what the place was like before summer.
  • There is more that nobody wrote, so we cannot answer it. Whether there is wifi, whether they charge corkage, how many high chairs there are, whether the table is yours for a fixed time — not a line in any of the twenty-six posts. Only one writer mentions takeaway, and only to say that it covers the eel bowl, the desserts and the tempura and nothing else; whether the price is the same, or when you can order it, we do not know. One writer remarks on foreign customers — more of them here, they say, than at most Busan restaurants just now — but nobody says whether there is a menu in English or Japanese. A line about Alipay and WeChat Pay appears in one post, inside a copied listing block, so we have not counted it.

Sources (26)

Every number above was counted from the posts below.

  1. [부산 맛집]부산 해목 장어덮밥, 부산 여행에서 꼭 먹어봐야 할 한 끼 2026-09-27 · 재리의 일상 · via Daum
  2. 부산 해운대 맛집 | 해목 | 해운대장어덮밥 해운대카이센동 부산카이센동 해운대히츠마부시 부산... 2026-09-26 · 언젠가 봄은 찾아올 거야 · via Daum
  3. 부산 맛집 해운대 인생장어덮밥 미슐랭 해목 내돈내산 2026-09-26 · 톨톨이네/ 뷰티 맛집 반려견
  4. 해목 해운대점, 해운대 장어덮밥 맛집 +웨이팅은 테이블링 2026-09-25 · 효둥이의 일상 · via Daum
  5. 해운대 맛집 해목 | 카이센동부터 히츠마부시까지 먹어 본 후기 2026-09-24 · 일나
  6. 부산 해운대 미쉐린 맛집 해목 장어덮밥 & 카이센동 2026-09-24 · 먹팅의 먹부림 · via Daum
  7. 해운대 해목 웨이팅 후기|카이센동 장어덮밥 후기 부산 해운대 맛집 2026-09-23 · 혼자서도 슬기롭게, 혼슬라이프 · via Daum
  8. 해목 (해운대 웨이팅을 뚫고) 2026-09-23 · 빙수사장이 꿈 · via Daum
  9. 부산 2박3일 뚜벅이가 직접 다녀온 필수 여행코스 총정리 해운대 광안리 핫플만 다녀옴 2026-09-22 · 피그느와르의 이것저것 남기는 기록 · via Daum
  10. [부산 맛집] 2026 부산 미슐랭 맛집(해운대맛집) / 해목 해운대점 웨이.... 2026-09-22 · 꼼시랑님의 블로그
  11. 부산 해운대 히츠마부시 카이센동 맛집 해목 | 내돈내산 솔직후기 (.... 2026-09-21 · 어떠른져메 저떠른져메
  12. 부산 해운대 웨이팅 필수인 2026 미쉐린 선정 장어덮밥 맛집 <해목> 2026-09-21 · 혢영
  13. 부산 해운대 | 장어덮밥, 카이센동 맛집 해목 2026-09-21 · 이것저것 다 해보는 리뷰어
  14. 행복은 어디에나.🤍 2026-09-21 · 엉망진창 · via Daum
  15. 신혼여행 뒷풀이 (?) BUSAN 🌊 2026-09-18 · 소심한 관종 · via Daum
  16. [해운대 맛집] 부산 미슐랭 장어덮밥과 카이센동 해목 2026-09-17 · 재미야 안뇽
  17. 부산 미슐랭 추천 맛집 해목 해운대점 장어덮밥 카이센동 2026-09-16 · 두유의 하루모음zip
  18. 부산광역시 해운대구 우동 '해목' 2026-09-16 · 토마토마의 맛-사랑
  19. [2025년 3월] 부산출장&여행/해목 해운대점 특장어덮밥&특카이센동 2026-09-15 · 놀러가자~~♡
  20. 부산 해운대 미쉐린 장어덮밥 맛집 : 해목 해운대점 2026-09-13 · Ta-da! 다시쓰는 먹방일기
  21. "부산 해운대구" 부산 해운대 맛집 해목 해운대점, 장어덮밥 히츠마.... 2026-09-12 · 콩비서의 하루
  22. 부산 해운대 맛집 해목, 장어덮밥 히츠마부시 후기 2026-09-09 · Orbdahae
  23. [맛집] 부산 미슐랭 카이센동 맛집,해목 2026-08-29 · 인생비전연구소 : 배당투자의 바이블
  24. (부산 해운대) 해목 / 테이블링 주말 웨이팅 / 한번은 가볼 맛집 / 내.... 2026-08-21 · 사칠이는 뭘 먹고 살이 쪘나
  25. 부산 해운대 | 해목 해운대점 후기(웨이팅, 주차장) 2026-08-14 · 황팅 :D 일상
  26. [부산/해운대]해운대 맛집 해목 평일 웨이팅 후기 2026-07-18 · 여너의 하루

Of 318 candidate posts we opened 46 and kept 26 as evidence. We stop once 30 are confirmed: beyond that the counts grow in proportion without changing the answer.